Legal Opinion

Shongutsie v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1992No. 90-269PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The essential issue that the court must resolve in this case is whether the representation of Lindberg Shongutsie (Shongut-sie) and his wife, Rebecca Shongutsie, by the same attorney at a joint trial deprived Shongutsie of his constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel. Collateral issues are presented involving the consent of Shongutsie to the joint representation; suppression by the State of discoverable materials; a claim of unlawful joinder; and the impropriety of the imposition of restitution at sentencing. We reverse and remand this case for a new trial…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Dickeson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Asch v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Calene v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Kolb v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Murray v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API