Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Lusk
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 1, 1994No. A062846PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
27 Cal.App.4th 1709 (1994)
34 Cal. Rptr.2d 265
EMORY THOMAS, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
BENJAMIN LUSK, JR., Defendant and Appellant.
Docket No. A062846.
Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.
September 1, 1994.
COUNSEL
Benjamin Lusk, Jr., and Donald M. Brown for Defendant and Appellant.
Oreck & Oreck and Eugene R. Oreck for Plaintiff and Respondent.
OPINION
NEWSOM, J.
On July 22, 1987, respondent Emory Thomas was employed as an "aircraft repairer" at the Alameda Naval Air Station. While disassembling a jet engine in the course of his employment duties, respondent used a Garland…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Sindell v. Abbott LaboratoriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Daly v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Budd v. NixenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Williams v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Wolf v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Sargent Fletcher, Inc. v. Able Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Williams v. WraxallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Bookout v. State of California Ex Rel. Department of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Corbett v. Hayward Dodge, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.