Legal Opinion

Frank v. Fitz Enterprises, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 6, 1991No. A8801-00293; CA A60972PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, C. J.

Plaintiff owned what had been a gasoline service station. Defendant operates cardlock stations. Plaintiff contacted defendant’s president, Fitz, and began negotiations with him. Defendant agreed to lease the property from plaintiff, who agreed to remodel and pay for converting the station to a cardlock operation; defendant agreed to finance the improvements. The station opened, but it never reached the anticipated sales level of 15,000 gallons a month. The parties became embroiled in disputes, and defendant refused to provide the promised financing.

Plaintiff then brought this action for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Musgrave Et Ux. v. Lucas Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Holland v. LentzOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Vancil v. PoulsonOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Federici Et Ux v. LehmanOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Criqui v. Pearl Music Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Petty v. Rogue Federal Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. Gillett v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  3. Buckner v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. Allen v. loanDepot.com, LLCDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API