Legal Opinion

Gillett v. Tucker

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 16, 2022No. A173527PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

570 Argued and submitted August 31, 2021; general judgment on claims for breach of contract with respect to option to purchase and down payment, unjust enrichment, and fraud in the inducement reversed, money award in general judgment reversed and remanded, otherwise affirmed; supplemental judgment reversed and remanded February 16, 2022 Kirsta S. GILLETT and Todd L. Gillett, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Michael J. TUCKER and Deborah Y. Tucker, Defendants-Appellants. Lane County Circuit Court 18CV58608; A173527

507 P3d 323

In this action arising out of a lease of two apartment buildings,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. Clemente-PerezOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Falk v. AmsberryOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Peiffer v. HoytOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Ken Hood Construction Co. v. Pacific Coast Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. Fraker v. BENTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICECourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kizer Excavating v. Stout Building ContractorsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  2. Granados v. OnPoint Community Credit UnionDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API