Buckner v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
TIKTIN, J. pro tempore
Defendants Shannen Beckwith (Beckwith) and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (Home Depot), Beckwith’s employer, appeal from a judgment for plaintiff on his claim for intentional interference with economic relations. They argue that plaintiff failed to prove that Beckwith interfered with plaintiff’s employment by an improper means because there is no evidence that statements that Beckwith made to plaintiffs employer were misrepresentations of fact rather than opinions. We affirm.
Defendants assign error to the trial court’s denial of their motion for a directed verdict. We review…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- McGanty v. StaudenrausOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Top Service Body Shop, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Slover v. Oregon State Board of Clinical Social WorkersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Shockey v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Holland v. LentzOregon Supreme Court · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brown v. GattiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004