Legal Opinion

New England National Bank v. Hubbell

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1925PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.

— The facts in this case are substantially as follows: On August 12, 1919, the Thousand Springs Land & Irrigation Company, an Idaho corporation, herein referred to as the company, executed and delivered to the State Bank of Idaho Falls, hereinafter named as the State Bank, a promissory note in the principal sum of $8,500, dated August 12, 1919. About the same time, the note was indorsed by respondents W. T. Pettinger, C. W. Mulhall, J. I. Hubbel, Dow Williams and Armour & Douglass, copartners, by T. M. Douglass, Jr., and by W. II. dyne, these parties being some of the stockholders of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jones v. City of CaldwellIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Padgett v. LewisSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  3. Central Branch Union Pacific Railroad v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  4. Vincent v. RussellOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Hall v. Farmers BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mason Ex Rel. Mason v. Hillsdale Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Benjamin Funk and Betty Lou Funk v. Ward Tifft D/B/A the Tifft Agency and Pendor-Idaho CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  3. Jackman v. HamersleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Prewett v. First Nat. Bank of HagermanIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Stivers v. Sidney Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API