Vincent v. Russell
Oregon Supreme Court
From Crook; T. E. J. Duffy, Judge. In Banc.
1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant rendered upon the verdict of a jury. The complaint is based upon a promissory note *673for the sum of $5,000, dated at Prineville, Oregon, April 18, 1918, due November 5th, after date, payable to the order of A. A. Piper in the usual form, signed by J. H. Russell, indorsed to Paxton Brothers, a corporation, May 15, 1918, and on the same date indorsed to Baker & Boyer National Bank, and on March 18, 1919, indorsed to plaintiff, Henry H. Vincent. Each indorsement is alleged to be for value received in due course of business.
Defendant answered…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ware v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- McNight v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Smith v. . DotterweichNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Wilson v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1894
- Lavalleur v. HahnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Walker v. CopelandWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Handley v. DrumAppellate Court of Illinois · 1925
- First Methodist Episcopal Church v. SodenWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- McClintock v. AyersWyoming Supreme Court · 1927
- New England National Bank v. HubbellIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.