Legal Opinion
In re Kitchings
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 22, 2004No. 99-BG-1023PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
We remanded this case to the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) to consider and make recommendations on the appropriate disposition, taking into account the additional twelve charges to which Bar Counsel and respondent had stipulated, and not only the three charges that were formally charged and presented to the hearing committee and the Board. See In re Kitchings, 779 A.2d 926, 933 (D.C.2001). On remand, Bar Counsel and respondent continued to suggest the six-month suspension with a requirement of fitness that had been part of the memorandum of understanding that led to the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re RoundtreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- In Re GoffeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Matter of WillcherDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- In Re LylesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re MartinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- In Re SteeleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- In re FoxDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- In re Kenneth A. MartinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- In re Kenneth A. MartinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014