Legal Opinion
Agro Dutch Industries Ltd. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided November 20, 2007No. 2007-1011PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COTE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Agro Dutch Industries Limited (“Agro”) appeals from a decision of the United States Court of International Trade affirming the Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) finding of duty absorption during the fourth administrative review of an antidumping duty order governing the importation of certain preserved mushrooms from India. Agro Dutch Indus., Ltd. v. United States, No. 04-493, 2006 WL 785463 (Ct. Int’l Trade Mar. 28, 2006). Agro contends that Commerce did not have authority to make such a finding because Agro did not sell merchandise subject to the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Dorbest Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- NMB Singapore Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Xinjiamei Furniture (Zhangzhou) Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Itochu Building Products v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.