Legal Opinion

Degraff v. Smith

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1945No. Civil No. 4663PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStanford, C. J.

Yirgil Smith and Elizabeth Smith, husband and wife, the appellees herein, were the plaintiffs in the trial court. We shall, in this case, term them the plaintiffs, and Mollie DeGraff the defendant.

The defendant, Mollie DeGraff, a resident of Colorado, was engaged in the business of buying, selling, warehousing and wholesaling fresh fruits, vegetables and other commodities, and transporting them over the highways of Arizona to the State of Colorado. Defendant carried on such transportation by means of a Ford truck. Lloyd P. Mundee and Ealph Bird operated said truck for defendant.

On the night…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Emmons v. Southern Pac. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
  2. D. B. Loveman Co. v. BaylessTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Childress v. Lake Erie & Western RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Dare v. BossOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Inter State Motor Freight System v. HenryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Sparks v. Republic National Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Ford v. Revlon, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Siebrand v. GossnellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  4. Mensing v. SturgeonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
  5. Edgar T. Weekes v. Atlantic National Ins. Co., California State Auto Association v. Atlantic National Ins. Co., Atlantic National Ins. Co. v. California State Auto AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API