Legal Opinion
United States v. Anderson
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided October 15, 1963No. Civ. A. No. 7860PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOYLE, District Judge.
On July 16, 1963, plaintiff was ordered, pursuant to Rule 34, F.R.Civ.P., to produce files of the Small Business Administration and the Securities and Exchange Commission in the Durox Reorganization. The United States has submitted to the Court, pursuant to a stipulation between the parties, certain documents deemed by it to be privileged and exempt from disclosure. Pursuant to a further order of the Court, plaintiff has filed an additional memorandum in which it has attempted to categorize the docu*520ments so as to clarify its position in regard to its claim of privilege.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
- Radiant Burners, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. American Gas Association, Peoples Gas Light and Coke CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
- Vilastor-Kent Theatre Corp. v. BrandtDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Connecticut Mut. Life Ins. v. ShieldsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces TecumCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- In the Matter of Grand Jury Proceedings. Frank J. Duffy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- In Re: GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION United States of America, Movant-Appellee, v. John Doe, Interested-Party-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- In re Penn Central Commercial Paper LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.