Connecticut Mut. Life Ins. v. Shields
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
EDELSTEIN, District Judge.
The defendant Shields & Company has moved for the production of certain documents under Rule 34, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., and under Rule 37(a), to compel answers to certain questions propounded to a witness upon his deposition. The discovery proceedings occur in connection with three unconsolidated actions by investors to rescind their purchases, in November of 1950, of an amount of revenue bonds pertaining to a bridge in Nebraska, on the ground of material misrepresentation. In June of 1953 the plaintiff Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Scourtes v. Fred W. Albrecht Grocery Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1953
- Bifferato v. States Marine Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
3Cited by16 opinions
- In Re Convergent Technologies Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1985
- Transamerica Computer Company, Inc., and v. International Business MacHines Corporation, AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Stix Products, Inc. v. United Merchants & Manufacturers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Transmirra Products Corp. v. Monsanto Chemical Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960
- Georgia-Pacific Plywood Co. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.