Legal Opinion

Vilastor-Kent Theatre Corp. v. Brandt

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 6, 1956PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEIBELL, District Judge.

This action was commenced on December 14, 1953, to recover treble damages alleged to have been sustained in the operation of the Kent and Terrace The-atres in Yonkers, New York, as a result of alleged violations of the anti-trust laws. The case was referred to me to conduct a pretrial, after all depositions had been completed, and to hear any motions that might be made meanwhile.

Plaintiff has moved by oral motion under Rule 34, 28 U.S.C.A., for an order directing the defendant to produce a memorandum dated July 6, 1951, prepared by Mr. Sam Boverman, then an *523attorney in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Tobacco & Allied Stocks, Inc. v. Transamerica Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1954
  3. Connecticut Mut. Life Ins. v. ShieldsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  2. Burlington Industries v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1974
  3. Transamerica Computer Company, Inc., and v. International Business MacHines Corporation, AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  4. Handgards, Inc. v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1976
  5. United States v. Sanmina CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API