Legal Opinion

Bickerstaff Clay Products Co. v. Dixon

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided October 26, 1983No. Civ. 3747PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a workmen's compensation case.

The claimant injured his back while working at Bickerstaff Clay's brickmaking plant. After hearing, the trial court found the claimant to have a fifty percent permanent partial disability to earn and awarded him $148 per week for 260 weeks and four days. Subsequently, the court amended its judgment, allowing only $74 per week for 260 weeks and four days. After a hearing on the proper calculation of benefits due and on the employer's motion for a new trial, the court again amended its judgment, allowing claimant $126.73 per week for 260 weeks and three…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. BF Goodrich Company v. MartinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1971
  2. Young v. City of HuntsvilleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1976
  3. Ex Parte Young.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  4. Fruehauf Corp. v. PraterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  5. Pinto Island Metals Co. Inc. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Allen v. Diversified ProductsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  2. Taylor v. MOBILE PULLEY & MACHINE WORKSCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  3. Magouirk v. United Parcel ServiceCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  4. Federal Mogul Corp. v. CampbellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  5. Winston Furniture, Inc. v. KirkpatrickCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API