Legal Opinion
Taylor v. MOBILE PULLEY & MACHINE WORKS
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Decided November 21, 1997No. 2961007PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The employee appeals from an award of workers' compensation benefits. Charles Vincent Taylor, Sr., sued his employer, Mobile Pulley Machine Works, for workers' compensation benefits based on a schizoaffective disorder that developed after he suffered an on-the-job injury. After a trial, the trial court entered an order finding Taylor totally, permanently disabled, but limiting his workers' compensation benefits to a five-year period. Only Taylor appeals.
The facts, as determined by the trial court, are as follows: Taylor was employed by Mobile Pulley as a welder for 23 years. On January 23,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Blue Bell, Inc. v. NicholsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
- McMillan, Ltd. v. WARRIOR DRILLING & ENG.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- International Paper Co. v. RogersCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986
- Fruehauf Corp. v. PraterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
- Price v. South Central BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. KennedyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
- Hooker Construction, Inc. v. WalkerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
- Reeves Rubber, Inc. v. WallaceCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005
- Alamo v. PCH HOTELS AND RESORTS, INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
- Associated Grocers of the South, Inc. v. GoodwinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.