Legal Opinion

Anna L. Lambert v. John H. Park, M.D.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 25, 1979No. 78-1162PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKAY, Circuit Judge.

The problem this diversity case presents is whether the doctrine of “informed consent” 1 in medical malpractice cases is a part of Oklahoma law. If it is, we must decide whether the trial court erred in not instructing the jury on “informed consent” in light of the evidence introduced at trial. It is clear that the law of Oklahoma is in flux and that we have no unambiguous guidance in Oklahoma case law on whether the doctrine is recognized by the courts of that state. This is nowhere more clearly illustrated than in the reliance by both parties on the same case, Martin v.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Schloendorff v. Society of the New York HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Cobbs v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Sard v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  4. Wilson v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Trogun v. FruchtmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Woolley v. HendersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  2. Goss v. Oklahoma Blood InstituteCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990
  3. Heinrich v. Master Craft Engineering, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2015
  4. Condos v. Musculoskeletal Transplant FoundationDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2002
  5. Fleeta H. Haley, and Allen Haley, Sr. v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API