Condos v. Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation
District Court, D. Utah
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BENSON, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The above-named plaintiffs filed this action against defendants Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation (“MTF”) and Os-teotech, Inc. (“Osteotech”) to recover damages for injuries allegedly caused by bone tissue that was implanted into plaintiff Chris Condos. Plaintiffs seek recovery under theories of strict products liability, breach of implied warranty, and negligence. Because plaintiffs’ warranty claims require essentially the same analysis as strict liability, those claims will be treated jointly as strict products liability…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ernest W. Hahn, Inc. v. Armco Steel Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1979
- Straub v. Fisher and Paykel Health CareUtah Supreme Court · 1999
- Salt Lake City Corp. v. Kasler Corp.District Court, D. Utah · 1994
- Trinity Universal Insurance Co. v. StrezaColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Richard (Rickey) Palermo v. LifeLink Foundation, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2014
- Palermo v. LifeLink Foundation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2014
- In re Coloplast Corp. Pelvic Support Systems Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2016
- In re Coloplast Corp. Pelvic Support Systems Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2016
- In re Coloplast Corp. Pelvic Support Systems Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.