Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Aguirre

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 26, 1970No. Crim. 17075PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

REPPY, J.—

I. Statement of the Case

Defendant was charged by information with two violations of section 11911 of the Health and Safety Code, possession for sale of a restricted dangerous drug. Count I specified amphetamine sulphate (benzedrine). Count II specified barbituric acid (seconal). Following denials of motions made under Penal Code sections 995 and 1538.5, defendant pleaded not guilty. The matter was submitted properly to the trial court without a jury on the transcript of the preliminary hearing and additional evidence. Defendant was found guilty on both counts and sentenced to…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Vale v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. People v. RedmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. People v. RouserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. People v. McFadinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API