Legal Opinion

People v. Smith

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 28, 1977No. Docket Nos. 2422, 2440PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GARGANO, J.

In February 1975 the Grand Jury of Tuolumne County returned indictments in the superior court of that county charging appellants Stuart Smith, Patrick O’Neill and Hubbard Shawhan with a conspiracy to transport marijuana and to possess marijuana for sale (Pen. Code, § 182, subd. 1; Health & Saf. Code, §§ 11359, 11360). In addition, Smith and O’Neill were charged with transporting marijuana and with possession of the contraband for sale; Shawhan was charged with attempting to transport marijuana and with possession of the contraband for sale. Thereafter each man entered pleas…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. HamiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. People v. ZichwicCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Jackson v. Superior Court of Kern Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. United States v. TussellDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. People v. SalihCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API