Legal Opinion

People v. Rouser

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 8, 1997No. C022519PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PUGLIA, P. J.

In this appeal we hold that contemporaneous possession in a state prison of two or more discrete controlled substances (here methamphetamines and heroin) at the same location constitutes but one offense under Penal Code section 4573.6.

A jury convicted defendant, a state prison inmate, of three counts of possession of a controlled substance by a prisoner in violation of Penal Code section 4573.6 (count 2 [possession of cocaine base and marijuana on March 6, 1993], count 3 [possession of methamphetamine on June 26, 1995] and count 4 [possession of heroin on June 26,1995];…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. In Re TartarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. People v. FuhrmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. In Re AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. ValenzuelaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. People v. RowlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. People v. HERTZIGCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. People v. Carleisha P.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. People v. DEGUZMANCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API