Legal Opinion

Garza Garza v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided April 12, 1990No. 13-89-127-CR to 13-89-129-CRPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NYE, Chief Justice.

A jury found appellant, Danilo Garza Garza, guilty of murder, aggravated kidnapping and aggravated sexual assault. Each offense was enhanced by two prior felony offenses. The trial court assessed punishment for each offense at life in the Texas Department of Corrections. Appellant’s counsel filed a frivolous appellate brief in which he raises four points of error. Appellant filed a pro se brief in which he raises six points of error. We examine all points and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence on all three…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Ex Parte DuffyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. Butler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. Allridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Skillern v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
  2. Continental Coffee Products Co. v. Cazarez, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1995
  3. Haynes & Boone v. Bowser Bouldin, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1993
  4. Rushing v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Sanders v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API