Legal Opinion

Borrego v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided December 28, 1990No. 13-89-392-CRPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEERDEN, Justice.

A jury found appellant, Jesse Borrego, guilty of aggravated assault, that both enhancement paragraphs in the indictment were true and that appellant used a deadly weapon during the commission of the offense. Appellant’s punishment was set at seventy-five years’ confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division. By three points of error, appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to show that he used a knife, and that the knife was a deadly weapon. He also attacks the State’s jury argument. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

The…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. David W. McKay v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Butler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  4. McKay v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  5. Kinnamon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Zayas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998
  2. Juhasz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1992
  3. McFarland v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1992
  4. Anderson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1994
  5. Delgado v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API