Borrego v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEERDEN, Justice.
A jury found appellant, Jesse Borrego, guilty of aggravated assault, that both enhancement paragraphs in the indictment were true and that appellant used a deadly weapon during the commission of the offense. Appellant’s punishment was set at seventy-five years’ confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division. By three points of error, appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to show that he used a knife, and that the knife was a deadly weapon. He also attacks the State’s jury argument. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- David W. McKay v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Butler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- McKay v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Kinnamon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Zayas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998
- Juhasz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1992
- McFarland v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1992
- Anderson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1994
- Delgado v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.