Legal Opinion
Seward v. B.O.C. Division of General Motors Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided October 26, 1992No. 91 C 7599PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NORGLE, District Judge.
Before the court is defendant General Motor Corporation’s (“GMC”) motion for summary judgment. For the following reasons, the motion is granted.
FACTS
Prior to December 31,1989, plaintiff Don L. Seward (“Seward”) was employed by the B.O.C. (Buick, Oldsmobile, Cadillac) Division of General Motors Corporation. Seward had been employed by GMC since graduating from college with a bachelor’s degree in business administration in 1952, and since 1966, had worked in various management/supervisory positions. The final position held by Seward at GMC was that of a “shift…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bank Leumi Le-Israel, B.M., a Foreign Corporation v. Dennis Lee, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Eugene Pierce v. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co., D/B/A Santa Fe Railroad Co., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Carlile v. Snap-On ToolsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- Hurd v. Wildman, Harrold, Allen and DixonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- Golden v. McDermott, Will & EmeryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- Sprague v. General Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.