Legal Opinion
Hurd v. Wildman, Harrold, Allen and Dixon
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided February 2, 1999No. 1-98-1277PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cousins
On August 21, 1997, plaintiff, Matthew A. Hurd, filed his complaint at law alleging breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty by defendant, Wildman, Harrold, Allen & Dixon. On October 27, 1997, defendant filed its motion to dismiss plaintiffs complaint, with prejudice, pursuant to sections 2—615, 2—619(a)(6) and 2—619(a)(9) of the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure (735 ILCS 5/2—615, 2—619(a)(6), (a)(9) (West 1996)) (Code). Following hearings on the motion, the trial court found that plaintiff was not an “employee” pursuant to the Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act (820 ILCS 115/1…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Farm Credit Bank of St. Louis v. WhitlockIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
- Rakowski v. LucenteIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
- Margarita SERAPION, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Fred H. MARTINEZ, Et Al., Defendants, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- P. Larue Simpson v. Ernst & YoungCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- KALPLAN v. KaplanIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Jung v. Association of American Medical CollegesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Krilich v. American National Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002
- Thornwood, Inc. v. Jenner & BlockAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- Darrell Cannon v. Jon BurgeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Fuller Family Holdings, LLC v. Northern Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.