Legal Opinion

Gianotti v. Barucci, No. 181644 (Oct. 24, 1990)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided October 24, 1990No. 181644Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON DEFENDANT'S CLAIM FOR EXEMPTION FROM EXECUTION AGAINST DEBT DUE FROM BANKING INSTITUTION. NATURAL PERSON AS DEBTOR. CGS 52-367b The defendant in the above captioned case has filed with Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc. and with this court an exemption claim form Jd-CV-24a Rev 9-87 in which he claims by way of affidavit that his IRA account with Prudential Bache Securities 042-819611 is exempt by law from execution pursuant to 52-352a (M) of the General Statutes.

Section 52-352a(M) states…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Peck v. JacqueminSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  3. Orticelli v. PowersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  5. Caldor, Inc. v. HeffernanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API