Isbell v. Lennox
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtWillson, C. J.
(after stating the facts as above).
It appears from the record that appellants objected, hut did not state the grounds of their objection, to certain instructions the trial court gave to the jury. A general objection is not a compliance with the requirement of the statute (article 1971, Vernon’s Sayles’ Civ. St. 1914) that objections a party has to instructions shall be presented to the court before such instructions are read to the jury. The plain purpose of the statute, said Chief Justice Phillips, in Walker v. Haley (Sup.) 214 S. W. 295—
“is to provide the court, in advance, with the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gulf, Texas & Western Railway Co. v. DickeyTexas Supreme Court · 1916
- Waterman Lumber Co. v. BeattyTexas Supreme Court · 1920
- Hendrick v. Blount-Decker Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- J. H. W. Steele Co. v. DoverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Roberts v. Houston Motor Car Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1916
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Isbell v. LennoxTexas Supreme Court · 1927
- Safeway Stores, Inc., of Texas v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
- TEXAS EMPLOYERS'INSURANCE ASSOCIATION v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Wise v. City of AbileneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Ansley v. Tarrant County Water Control & Improvement District No. OneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.