Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Coll
Indiana Court of Appeals
Erom Clark Circuit Court; James K. Marsh, Judge. Action by Bernard A. Coll against the Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant .appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtWiley, J.
From a judgment below against it appellant prosecutes this appeal, and by its assignment of errors it is entitled to have considered and reviewed the action of the trial court (1) in overruling its demurrer to the complaint; (2) in overruling its motion for judgment on the answers to interrogatories; and (3) in overruling its motion for a new trial.
The nature of the action will clearly appear from a statement of the facts pleaded in the complaint. It is *234averred that on September 21, 1903, appellee purchased of appellant at its ticket office in the city of Jeffersonville, Indiana, a special…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mosher v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Boylan v. Hot Springs RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Sinnott v. RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1900
- Western Maryland Railroad v. StocksdaleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
- Dangerfield v. Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1900
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. ApplegateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925