Legal Opinion

Dangerfield v. Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 9, 1900No. 11,649PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error from Osage district court; Wm. Thomson, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*86The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, J.:

Thomas Dangerfield, contemplating a trip to Europe and desirous of purchasing transportation from his home at Scranton, Kan., to the city of New York, applied to an agent at Scranton, who wrote to a ticket-broker in Topeka and from him procured the unused portion of' an excursion ticket over the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe railway. With this ticket he started on his journey, and the first conductor to whom he presented the ticket accepted it for passage from Topeka to Kansas City ; there another conductor came upon the train, and when the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Boylan v. Hot Springs RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Abram v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Moses v. East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
  4. Rahilly v. St. Paul & Duluth RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  5. Comer v. FoleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kirby v. Union Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  2. Jiménez v. ReilySupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1922
  3. Laumbach v. Board of County Commissioners of San Miguel CountyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Peterson v. City of ParsonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  5. Chanlder v. StarlingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API