Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Richter

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1915No. 12711PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Prater, J., entered February 16, 1915, upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, dismissing an action to recover money wrongfully withdrawn from the funds of a corporation.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

The appellant, as trustee in bankruptcy of the Seattle Sporting Goods Company, a corporation, instituted this action against the respondent, Richter, together with one J. L. Marr and one S. G. Hamilton, to recover the sum of $15,000, alleged to have been unlawfully withdrawn from the capital stock of the corporation named during the time its business was administered by the respondent and others while acting as trustees of the corporation. A de*452murrer was interposed to the complaint by all of the defendants, on the grounds, first, that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cornell v. EdsenWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Union Trust Co. v. AmeryWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Brenaman v. WhitehouseWashington Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Fratt v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  2. Becker v. BillingsIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Noble v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Gaston v. HartzellNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Kundahl v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API