Linton v. Smith & Wesson
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stamos
Plaintiff appeals from the dismissal of counts I and II of his second amended complaint seeking recovery from defendant, a handgun manufacturer, based upon its distribution of a gun which was used by a third party to injure plaintiff.
This action arose out of personal injuries suffered by plaintiff when he was shot in a Chicago tavern. Plaintiff’s original complaint named Smith & Wesson and the tavern owner as defendants. Recovery was sought against Smith & Wesson, the manufacturer of the firearm used to shoot plaintiff, on a theory of strict liability in tort. Plaintiff’s claim against the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Moning v. AlfonoMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
- Pelham v. GriesheimerIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
- Pitts v. BasileIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
- Semeniuk v. ChentisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1954
- Maramba v. NeumanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Hamilton v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2001
- City of Chicago v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2004
- Young v. Bryco ArmsIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
- Kelley v. R.G. Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Riordan v. International Armament Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.