Legal Opinion

Linton v. Smith & Wesson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 18, 1984No. 83-2544PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stamos

Plaintiff appeals from the dismissal of counts I and II of his second amended complaint seeking recovery from defendant, a handgun manufacturer, based upon its distribution of a gun which was used by a third party to injure plaintiff.

This action arose out of personal injuries suffered by plaintiff when he was shot in a Chicago tavern. Plaintiff’s original complaint named Smith & Wesson and the tavern owner as defendants. Recovery was sought against Smith & Wesson, the manufacturer of the firearm used to shoot plaintiff, on a theory of strict liability in tort. Plaintiff’s claim against the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moning v. AlfonoMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Pelham v. GriesheimerIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Pitts v. BasileIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Semeniuk v. ChentisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1954
  5. Maramba v. NeumanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. City of Chicago v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Young v. Bryco ArmsIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Kelley v. R.G. Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  5. Riordan v. International Armament Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API