Legal Opinion

Riordan v. International Armament Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 4, 1985No. 83—2110, 83—2164 consPublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE JIGANTI

delivered the opinion of the court:

These consolidated appeals present the issue of whether a cause of action in tort exists in Illinois against the manufacturers and distributors of handguns for injuries caused by the criminal misuse of their handguns by third parties.

On June 6, 1981, James J. Riordan was killed when, while attempting to restrain an individual in a downtown Chicago restaurant, he was struck by a bullet from a small caliber semiautomatic handgun manufactured and designed by defendant, Walther Waffenfabrik, GmbH, a West German corporation, and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Suvada v. White Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Moning v. AlfonoMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Genaust v. Illinois Power Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Dunham v. Vaughan & Bushnell Mfg. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1969

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Ashley County, Ark. v. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  2. Kirk v. Michael Reese Hospital & Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Hamilton v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. City of Chicago v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Young v. Bryco ArmsIllinois Supreme Court · 2004

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API