Legal Opinion

Pitts v. Basile

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1966No. 39197PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schaefer

Dale Pitts, a minor, brought this action by his mother and next friend to recover for injuries incurred when he was struck in the eye by a dart thrown by another boy. The defendants were Joseph Basile and Salvatore Inzerillo, who operated the neighborhood grocery store at which the darts were purchased, and Ambrose Maiers, doing business as Pacific Toy House, the wholesaler who supplied the darts to the other defendants. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff and against all defendants in the sum of $50,000. The proprietors of the store filed no post-trial motions. Ambrose…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Semeniuk v. ChentisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1954
  2. Highsaw v. CreechCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933
  3. Morris v. Toy BoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. White v. PageOhio Court of Appeals · 1950
  5. Pitts v. BasileAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Williams v. Brown Manufacturing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Kroger Co. v. HaunIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Baughn v. Honda Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Fanning v. LeMayIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Riordan v. International Armament Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API