Legal Opinion
Goldsmith v. Moskowitz
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided March 30, 1977No. Docket 27154PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtD. E. Holbrook, J.
The plaintiffs brought this action for conspiracy to defraud, which plaintiffs claim resulted in the unlawful taking of their property by the defendants. At the oral argument, plaintiffs represented that the West Oakland Bank was named a defendant only because it held a mortgage on the property formerly owned by the plaintiffs, title of which was obtained by some of defendants as a result of the conspiracy to defraud, as alleged.
The complaint was filed on April 30, 1974, together with notices of lis pendens. The allegations charged therein set forth in part that defendants Ted Moskowitz and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ben P. Fyke & Sons v. Gunter Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1973
- Matson v. SoronenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- Reich v. State Highway CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Rubino v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
- Waldorf v. ZinbergMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Leahy v. Henry Ford HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
- Boyer v. Tucker & Baumgardner Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Burket v. LippittDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.