Legal Opinion

Burket v. Lippitt

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided April 23, 2008No. Nos. 05-72110, 05-72171, 05-72221Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART HYMAN LIPPITT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO ALL NON-CLIENT PLAINTIFFS AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART HYMAN LIPPITT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO REMAINING PLAINTIFFS

PATRICK J. DUGGAN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court in three separate but related suits alleging Exchange Act and state law violations: Burket, et al. v. Hyman Lippitt, et al., Case No. 05-72110; Adams, et al. v. Hyman Lippitt, et al., Case No. 05-72171; and Cliff, et al. v. Hyman Lippitt P.C., et al., Case No. 05-72221.…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API