Legal Opinion
Convergence Corp. v. Videomedia
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 6, 1982No. C-80-0786 WHO, C-80-0787 WHOPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ORRICK, District Judge.
Defendants in these related patent infringement actions have moved for summary judgment against the plaintiff on the basis of a judgment invalidating plaintiff’s patent in the Central District of California. One defendant additionally has moved for an award of attorney’s fees pursuant to 35 Ú.S.C. § 285. Plaintiff has moved to stay these proceedings pending a decision by the Ninth Circuit of its appeal from the earlier action. The Court declines to stay these proceedings, grants summary judgment in favor of the defendants, and denies defendant Videomedia’s motion…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- United Air Lines, Inc. v. Janice Wiener and Catherine B. Nollenberger (Excluding Faith C. Paris), United States of America v. Janice WienerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Bruszewski v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- California Chamber of Commerce v. SimpsonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1985
- Scripps Clinic & Research Foundation v. Baxter Travenol Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1990
- Alzheimer's Institute of America v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Medical Designs, Inc. v. Donjoy, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1992