Legal Opinion
Jack Barofsky v. General Electric Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 28, 1968No. 21415PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLEY, Circuit Judge:
This suit involves the validity and infringement of U. S. Design Patent No. D-176,492, issued to Jack Barofsky on January 3, 1956. Barofsky commenced the action against General Electric Corporation charging infringement of his patent and seeking damages and other relief. General Electric answered, denying infringement and asking for a declaratory judgment that the Barofsky patent is invalid.
After certain discovery activity, General Electric moved for summary judgment in its favor on the alternative grounds, that the Barofsky patent is invalid and that it has not been…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Joseph Schlitz Brewing Co. v. Houston Ice & Brewing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- John W. Bentley v. Sunset House Distributing Corp., Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Robert W. Brown & Co., Inc., Robert W. Brown and Olive W. Brown v. Leonard De Bell (Substituted for United States License Frame Mfg. Co.)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Payne Metal Enterprises, Ltd. v. McPheeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Bliss v. Gotham Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
3Cited by17 opinions
- Schwinn Bicycle Company v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Bergstrom v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1980
- Proler Steel Corporation, Inc. v. Luria Brothers & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- A & H Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Contempo Card Co., Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1983
- Design, Inc. v. Emerson Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1970
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.