Legal Opinion

Sheaff v. Husted

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 8, 1899No. 11371PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from court of appeals, northern department; John H. Mahan, Abijah Wells and Sam’l W. Mc-Elkoy, judges.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J. :

It will be decisive of' this case to determine whether a tenant of the owner of a fee-simple title to real estate may attorn to the holder of a tax deed regular on its face but voidable for the reason that illegal taxes were included in the amount of the expressed consideration stated in the same.

The plaintiff below, plaintiff in error here, was defeated in his action to quiet title upon the ground that he was not in possession of the property. One Barnes, the tenant of the defendants in error, after a tax deed had been issued, recorded, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lyon v. WashburnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1877
  2. Weichselbaum v. CurlettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
  3. Smith v. CooperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  4. Sheaff v. HustedCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1898

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jinkiaway v. FordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  2. Equitable Investment Trust Co. v. EssexSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  3. Wallace v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  4. West v. BruggerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  5. Fitch v. DouglassSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API