Legal Opinion

West v. Brugger

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 12, 1918No. 21,695PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Cherokee district court; James N. Dunbar, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

C. A. West brought an action against Wm. Brugger for the specific performance of a contract for a mining lease. Brugger defended on the ground that the plaintiffs privileges under the contract had been forfeited in consequence of a cessation of work thereunder for a period of ten days. A trial resulted in a judgment denying the plaintiff relief, and he appeals. N. W. Moxley was joined as a defendant, but, as the vital controversy was between West and Brugger, the latter will be spoken of as the defendant.

On August 10, 1916, the defendant,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sheaff v. HustedSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Hopkins v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  2. Safford v. TibbettsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API