Legal Opinion

Weichselbaum v. Curlett

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1878PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from Pawnee District Court. The district court, at the October Term 1877, gave judgment in favor of defendant Curlett, and the plaintiff brings the case here.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Horton, C. J.:

statement of facts. The plaintiff, Weichselbaum, was the owner of three certain buildings, situated on the Fort Larned military reservation, in Pawnee county. On 13th March 1875, he rented the buildings to the defendant Curlett, for one year from the 1st of May following, at a monthly rental of $17.50. The defendant paid the rent until 29th February 1876, at which time, and while he was occupying the buildings as a tenant of plaintiff, he purchased them at a tax sale held that day — the buildings having been sold as personal property, for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jackson ex dem. Russell v. RowlandNew York Supreme Court · 1831
  2. Bettison v. BuddSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1856
  3. Ferguson v. EtterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1860
  4. People v. CharlesNew York Supreme Court · 1846

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Eagle-Picher Lead Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  2. Boston Molasses Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  3. Duffitt v. TuhanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  4. Keith v. KeithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  5. Shoup v. Central Branch Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API