Legal Opinion
Blanchard v. Hoffman
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 16, 1923No. 23,056PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHallaM, J.
The trial court found, in substance, the following facts:
■ Plaintiff was the owner of a tract of suburban land in Ramsey county. It was heavily encumbered. On April 22, 1918, there were the following encumbrances:
A mortgage of $2,500 held by Charles Freitag.
A mortgage of $700, foreclosed January 18, 1918, by sale to Reed Mortgage & Investment Co.
A mortgage of $1,150, foreclosed April 28, 1917, by sale to Robert B. Burns, trustee, for $1,200.
Two mortgages to Van Sant Company on which no money had yet been paid over.
A judgment, executed April 9, 1917, by sale to Charles H. Jermy for $608.21. On…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Joyce v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Wilder v. HaugheySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
- John v. TimmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Pioneer Loan & Land Co. v. CowdenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Forest Lake State Bank v. EkstrandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lundeen v. NyborgSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Clausen v. SalhusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Murray v. WileyOregon Supreme Court · 1942