Legal Opinion

Clausen v. Salhus

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 26, 1932No. 28,795PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlsen, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment in, favor of defendants.

The action was brought in the municipal court of Minneapolis to recover possession of real property, a lot in Minneapolis on which there is a building, claimed to be wrongfully detained by the defendants.

Plaintiffs held a mortgage upon the property, which had been duly foreclosed and the year for redemption had expired. The defense was that the mortgage was usurious and that therefore the plaintiffs had acquired no title by the foreclosure. The court 'found the mortgage usurious and invalid and found plaintiffs not entitled to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Central Building & Loan Ass'n v. LampsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  2. Saxe v. WomackSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  3. Yellow Medicine County Bank v. CookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  4. Strickland v. First State Bank of BalatonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  5. Temple v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fred G. Clark Co. v. E. C. Warner Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  2. Dege v. Produce Exchange BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  3. Clausen v. SalhusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API