Legal Opinion

Uhrig v. Pulliam

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1986PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARBISON, Justice.

This action was brought by plaintiff, Lil Gordy Uhrig, as the surviving widow of Maurice Uhrig, deceased, seeking the enforcement of an antenuptial agreement between her and the decedent. In the alternative she sought to avoid the same and to assert her statutory rights as a surviving spouse. Named as defendants were the Administratrix of the estate and her sister, who were the beneficiaries under the probated last -will of the decedent. 1 Both the Chancellor and the Court of Appeals sustained the antenuptial agreement against a general attack that it was void for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Crenshaw v. MooreTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Hoyt v. HoytTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
  3. McAdams v. McAdamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Duncan v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
  5. Montesi v. Estate of MontesiTennessee Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kahn v. KahnTennessee Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Hall v. JeffersCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
  3. Estate of Marion English Truett (Deceased)Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API