Legal Opinion

Kahn v. Kahn

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 1988PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FONES, Justice.

We granted the husband’s Rule 11 application in this divorce case to examine the validity of the antenuptial agreement and the differences in the awards to the wife by the trial court and the Court of Appeals.

At the time of the marriage, 17 December 1982, husband was 63 years old and wife was 26 years old. The parties separated exactly two years and two months later, on 17 February 1985. Wife filed a complaint for divorce on 8 March 1985, alleging irreconcilable differences and cruel and inhuman treatment. Husband filed an answer and a counterclaim for divorce on the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Connors v. ConnorsTennessee Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Baker v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1940
  3. Wilson Management Co. v. Star Distributors Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Crouch v. CrouchCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1964
  5. Spurlock v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 1892

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Barnes v. BarnesTennessee Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Randolph v. RandolphTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Kline v. EyrichTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Matter of Estate of LutzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Cary v. CaryTennessee Supreme Court · 1996

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API