Legal Opinion

Duncan v. Duncan

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided March 8, 1983PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GODDARD, Judge.

In this divorce case, both parties appeal the judgment of the Trial Court which granted the Plaintiff, Earlene Duncan, a divorce along with alimony in solido in the amount of $25,000 and $750 in attorney fees. In making his award, the Chancellor upheld the provisions of the parties’ ante-nuptial agreement relating to the division of property, but held invalid that portion of the agreement dealing with alimony and attorney fees. The Defendant, Paul Duncan, asserts that the questions of alimony and attorney fees should be decided in accordance with the parties’ antenuptial…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crouch v. CrouchCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1964
  2. Hoyt v. HoytTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Raskind v. RaskindCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1959
  4. Ligon v. LigonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1979

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Frey v. FreyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  2. Kahn v. KahnTennessee Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Cary v. CaryTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Uhrig v. PulliamTennessee Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Perkinson v. PerkinsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API