Legal Opinion

Andrew v. Marshalltown State Bank

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 17, 1927PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWagner, J.

The Marshalltown State-Bank was open for business on.Aprii 14, 1926, until the usual closing hour at 8 ' o’clock P. M. This was the last day of the existence of the bank as a.going concern. The bank was not closed by the superintendent of banking, but about 5:30 P. M. of said day, the board of directors of .the bank resolved to cease its operation as a bank. At the usual hour of closing, .as aforesaid, the doors were locked, and at 3:30 P. M., the claimant made his presence known at one of the doors of said bank; and in accordance with the rule or custom of the bank, when patrons manifested a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Officer v. OfficerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  2. Steele v. Commissioner of BanksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  3. Acme Hay & Mill Feed Co. v. Metropolitan National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  4. Palo Alto County v. UlrichSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  5. Dubuque Fruit Co. v. C. C. Emerson & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Home Indemnity Co. v. State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  2. Andrew v. Security Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  3. Diehl v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Andrew v. Waterville Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  5. Andrew v. Security Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API