Dubuque Fruit Co. v. C. C. Emerson & Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtDe Graff, C. J.
This appeal presents a contest between plaintiff and the intervener over a fund under garnishment by virtue of a writ caused to be issued by plaintiff to secure a claimed indebtedness owed to plaintiff by the x defendant, a nonresident, who is not interested 9 9 jn outcome of the issue involved herein. Upon the conclusion of the evidence, the trial court sustained the intervener’s motion for judgment, on the primary ground that the testimony of the intervener as to its title and ownership of the fund in suit was without conflict, and consequently no fact question existed for submission to the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bee Building Co. v. DaltonNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
- Gammon v. AbramsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
- Vickers v. Machinery Warehouse & Sales Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
- Duluth Chamber of Commerce v. KnowltonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Acme Hay & Mill Feed Co. v. Metropolitan National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Nehring v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
- Andrew v. Security Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
- Robertson v. Central Manufacturers' Mutual InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1947
- Andrew v. Marshalltown State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- Blatz Brewing Co. v. Richardson & Richardson, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.