Legal Opinion

Benson v. Hygienic Artificial Ice Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 6, 1936No. 30,968PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

I. M. Olsen, Justice.

Proceedings by Neis J. Benson, relator, against Hygienic Artificial Ice Company and its insurer, respondents, to recover compensation for injuries claimed to have been received by him as an employe of respondent ice company and arising out of and in the course of his employment. The findings of the referee before whom the matter was heard were that at the time of the accident causing the injuries relator was employed under a Minnesota contract of hire as treasurer of the Hygienic Artificial Ice Company at a weekly wage of $17.30, but the referee found that the accidental…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Donaldson v. William H. B. Donaldson Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  2. Erickson v. Erickson Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  3. Supornick v. SupornickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rosenfield v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  2. Cosgriff v. Duluth Firemen's Relief Assn.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. Pederson v. PedersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  4. Bendix v. the Bendix Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  5. Delaney v. Dan Delaney, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API