Legal Opinion

Walsh v. Mankato Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 15, 1937No. 31,366PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Defendant Footh appeals from an order denying his motion for neAV trial. The action was brought against tAvo defendants, Footh and Mankato Oil Company, but at the opening of the trial plaintiff stated that he desired to proceed against Footh only, withdrawing his claim for relief against the company. Thus the trial proceeded, resulting in a verdict for plaintiff for $5,056.25. Hereafter Ave shall refer to Footh as defendant and to Mankato Oil Company as the company.

The facts are someAvhat involved, but those essential to intelligent revieAv may be summarized in this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Buck v. ColbathSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  2. Milbrath v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Engel v. MahlenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  4. Boston Clothing Co. v. GarlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  5. Oevermann v. LoebertmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Siats v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  2. Hutton v. BosigerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Hansen v. Terminal Manufacturing Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API