Legal Opinion

Moorhead v. JC Penney Co., Inc.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1977PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROCK, Justice.

This is an action to recover compensatory and punitive damages for the alleged infliction of “severe emotional distress, exasperation, physical irritability and nervousness, headaches, anger and frustration” upon the plaintiffs by a course of conduct on the part of the defendant and its agents which plaintiffs characterize as “outrageous.” The trial court dismissed the complaint, holding that it failed to state a cause of action upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiffs appealed.

I

Plaintiffs allege that they maintained a charge account with the defendant, J. C. Penney…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Medlin v. Allied Investment CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
  2. George v. Jordan Marsh CompanyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  3. Clark v. Associated Retail Credit Men of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  4. Johnson v. Woman's HospitalCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1975
  5. Barnett v. Collection Service Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Bain v. WellsTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Betty Saint Rogers v. Louisville Land CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Lawrence Ex Rel. Powell v. StanfordTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Leah B. Sibley v. Fulton Dekalb Collection ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  5. Laxton v. Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1982

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API