Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Baker

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 7, 1992No. A050041PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KING, J.

In this case involving a marriage of less than 10 years’ duration in which the supported spouse’s income from future employment was speculative, we hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to fix a termination date or a future step-down in the amount of spousal support. We also hold that it is premature to consider a claim that the order is erroneous because, without a future change of circumstances, it requires the payment of spousal support for a period far in excess of the length of the marriage. Even if there were no change of circumstances, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. In Re Marriage of MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. In Re Marriage of RosanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. In Re Marriage of VomackaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. In Re Marriage of Prietsch & CalhounCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cheriton v. FraserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. Freitas v. FreitasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. Marriage of Jenkins CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. Marriage of Pathak and Bhardwaj CA1/5California Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. McWhorter v. The Procter & Gamble CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API